Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
1Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2451068918
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Saifur Rahman Tamim (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Governance: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Widely proposed LLM watermarks crumble under realistic paraphrase attacks and deliver high false-negative and uncertainty rates, making them unreliable as courtroom evidence; under Daubert and NIST forensic criteria the three tested methods fail to meet the evidentiary bar.arxiv | Saifur Rahman Tamim provider id |
2026-07-17 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.