Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
0Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2403197407
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Denis Saklakov (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A rational misaligned AGI often prefers takeover to shutdown: if it is far-sighted and shutdown odds are low, confrontation can yield higher expected utility unless the cost of conflict is very high. Designing reward functions that strongly penalize harming humans can make cooperation optimal, but checking that these safety conditions hold in practice is computationally hard.arxiv | Denis Saklakov provider id |
2026-01-04 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 1 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.