The Commonplace
Home Dashboard Papers Evidence Digests 🎲
← Papers

Gen Z who trust AI marketing are much more likely to adopt it and become loyal customers: a survey of 450 respondents finds trust strongly raises adoption intention and produces a total loyalty effect of roughly 0.80 (direct 0.41, indirect ≈0.39).

Trust in AI-Driven Marketing and its Impact on Brand Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Adoption Intention among Generation Z Consumers
Norberto M. Secretaria · March 15, 2026 · International Review of Management and Marketing
openalex correlational low evidence 7/10 relevance DOI Source PDF
In a survey of 450 Gen Z consumers, trust in AI-driven marketing strongly predicts adoption intention (β=0.718) and both directly (β=0.410) and indirectly (indirect ≈0.390; total ≈0.800) increases brand loyalty.

This study is primarily focused on the determination of the influence of Trust in AI-driven marketing on Brand Loyalty, with Adoption Intention as a mediating factor among Generation Z consumers. The data were collected from 450 respondents and analyzed through Structural Equation Modeling using SPSS AMOS. The psychometric properties resulted in CFI = 0.980, TLI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.031, which demonstrates excellent fit indices confirming the model’s reliability and validity. Results show that trust is a significant predictor of both adoption intention (β = 0.718, p < .001) and brand loyalty (β = 0.410, p < .001), while adoption intention strongly influences brand loyalty (β = 0.717, p < .001). As to the mediation analysis, the result confirmed a significant indirect effect (β ≈ 0.390, p = 0.001), indicating that adoption intention partially mediates the trust–loyalty relationship. The findings of the study present a significant view on the importance of trust in shaping AI-aided marketing and its adoption, leading to loyalty among Generation Z consumers. This study adds to the literature of the Technology Acceptance Model and Relationship Marketing Theory, and provides managerial insights on how brands can enhance customer loyalty through proper implementation of trustworthy AI-driven marketing practices.

Summary

Main Finding

Trust in AI-driven marketing strongly increases Generation Z consumers’ intention to adopt AI marketing and directly boosts brand loyalty. Adoption intention partially mediates the trust→loyalty relationship, so trustworthy AI both directly raises loyalty and does so indirectly by increasing adoption. Reported total effect of trust on loyalty ≈ 0.800 (direct β = 0.410; indirect β ≈ 0.390; all p < .001).

Key Points

  • Sample: 450 Generation Z respondents.
  • Model fit (psychometrics): CFI = 0.980, TLI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.031 — indicating very good to excellent fit and reliable constructs.
  • Direct effects:
    • Trust → Adoption Intention: β = 0.718, p < .001 (strong positive effect).
    • Trust → Brand Loyalty: β = 0.410, p < .001 (moderate positive effect).
    • Adoption Intention → Brand Loyalty: β = 0.717, p < .001 (strong positive effect).
  • Mediation:
    • Adoption intention partially mediates the trust–loyalty link.
    • Indirect effect (trust → adoption → loyalty): β ≈ 0.390, p = 0.001 (statistically significant).
  • The study situates results within Technology Acceptance Model and Relationship Marketing Theory and offers managerial guidance for AI-driven marketing implementations targeted at Gen Z.

Data & Methods

  • Design: Cross-sectional survey of 450 Generation Z consumers.
  • Analysis: Structural Equation Modeling (SPSS AMOS).
  • Reliability/validity: High model fit (CFI/TLI ≈ .98/.97; SRMR .031; RMSEA .062) — supports construct validity and overall model reliability.
  • Statistical inference: Standardized path coefficients reported with p-values; mediation tested with indirect-effect significance (p = .001).
  • Limitations to note: cross-sectional/self-report design (limits causal claims), sample restricted to Generation Z (limits generalizability across cohorts/markets), potential common-method bias if not controlled.

Implications for AI Economics

  • Demand and adoption dynamics:
    • Trust is a principal demand driver for AI-enabled marketing; higher trust substantially raises adoption intention and thereby accelerates diffusion among Gen Z — firms should view trust-building as an investment in demand creation.
  • Customer lifetime value (CLV) and profitability:
    • Because trust raises loyalty directly and via adoption, investments in trustworthy AI systems (privacy, transparency, fairness) can increase retention and CLV, improving returns on AI marketing spend.
  • Pricing and willingness-to-pay:
    • Trust-enhancing features may support price premiums or reduced price sensitivity if consumers value trustworthy personalization and recommenders.
  • Investment allocation and ROI:
    • Given the large standardized effects, re-allocating budget toward trust-enhancing components (explainability, data protection, third-party certification, UX that communicates reliability) likely has high marginal value versus feature-only investments.
  • Market structure and competition:
    • Firms that credibly signal trustworthy AI may gain incumbency advantages among younger cohorts (network effects, stronger loyalty), potentially raising barriers to entry for less-trusted competitors.
  • Policy and externalities:
    • Findings support regulatory focus on transparency, auditability, and consumer protections: markets where trust is low may see slower adoption and lower welfare gains from AI marketing.
  • Labor and complementary capital:
    • Firms may re-skill marketing and analytics teams toward explainable-AI practices and human-in-the-loop oversight — complementary investments to maximize economic returns.
  • Research/evaluation economics:
    • Future economic models of AI diffusion should incorporate trust as a state variable affecting adoption rates and retention; microfoundations could model how trust formation (signaling, regulation, incident history) shifts demand curves and equilibrium market shares.

Practical takeaway: For firms targeting Gen Z, prioritize trustworthy design, clear communication of data practices, and adoption-friction reduction to convert trust into adoption and durable loyalty — these actions have measurable economic value through higher adoption, retention, and potentially pricing power.

Assessment

Paper Typecorrelational Evidence Strengthlow — Cross-sectional self-report survey with no experimental or quasi-experimental design; associations and mediation are statistically estimated but temporal ordering and causal confounding are not addressed, and common-method bias may inflate effects. Methods Rigormedium — Good sample size (n=450) and strong psychometric evidence (CFI/TLI ≈ .98/.97, SRMR .031, RMSEA .062) and appropriate SEM techniques were used, but reliance on convenience/self-report sampling and cross-sectional data limits internal validity and causal interpretation. SampleCross-sectional online survey of 450 Generation Z consumers (age cohort specified as Gen Z; exact country/setting and sampling frame not reported), reporting measures of trust in AI-driven marketing, adoption intention, and brand loyalty. Themesadoption org_design GeneralizabilityRestricted to Generation Z — results may not generalize to older cohorts, Likely convenience/online sample with unspecified country or cultural context, Findings specific to AI-driven marketing contexts and may not extend to other AI applications (e.g., workplace automation, enterprise AI), Self-report measures and cross-sectional design limit external validity across real-world behavioral settings

Claims (11)

ClaimDirectionConfidenceOutcomeDetails
Trust in AI-driven marketing has a strong positive effect on Generation Z consumers' intention to adopt AI marketing (Trust → Adoption Intention: standardized β = 0.718, p < .001). Adoption Rate positive high Adoption Intention
n=450
standardized β = 0.718 (p < .001)
0.15
Trust in AI-driven marketing directly increases Generation Z consumers' brand loyalty (Trust → Brand Loyalty: standardized β = 0.410, p < .001). Consumer Welfare positive high Brand Loyalty
n=450
standardized β = 0.410 (p < .001)
0.15
Adoption intention for AI marketing strongly predicts brand loyalty (Adoption Intention → Brand Loyalty: standardized β = 0.717, p < .001). Consumer Welfare positive high Brand Loyalty
n=450
standardized β = 0.717 (p < .001)
0.15
Adoption intention partially mediates the relationship between trust and brand loyalty (indirect effect Trust → Adoption → Loyalty: standardized β ≈ 0.390, p = 0.001). Adoption Rate positive medium Brand Loyalty (indirect effect via Adoption Intention)
n=450
indirect standardized β ≈ 0.390, p = 0.001
0.09
Total effect of trust on brand loyalty is approximately 0.800 (total β ≈ 0.800 = direct β 0.410 + indirect β ≈ 0.390), all reported as statistically significant (p < .001 for direct effects; p = .001 for indirect). Adoption Rate positive high Brand Loyalty (total effect of Trust)
n=450
total standardized β ≈ 0.800 (direct β ≈ 0.410 + indirect β ≈ 0.390), p < .001 (direct), p = .001 (indirect)
0.15
The measurement and structural model show good to excellent fit and reliable constructs (CFI = 0.980, TLI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.031). Research Productivity null_result high Model fit / construct validity
n=450
CFI = 0.980, TLI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.031
0.15
Study design: cross-sectional self-report survey of 450 Generation Z consumers analyzed with Structural Equation Modeling (SPSS AMOS). Research Productivity null_result high Study design / sample
n=450
0.15
Because the study is cross-sectional and self-report, causal claims are limited and generalizability is restricted to Generation Z (limitation noted in the paper). Research Productivity null_result high Inference validity / generalizability
n=450
0.15
Trust is a principal demand driver for AI-enabled marketing among Generation Z — higher trust substantially raises adoption intention and thereby accelerates diffusion. Adoption Rate positive medium Adoption Intention / diffusion implications
n=450
standardized β = 0.718 (Trust → Adoption Intention)
0.09
Investments in trustworthy AI systems (privacy, transparency, fairness) can increase retention and customer lifetime value because trust raises loyalty directly and via adoption. Firm Revenue positive speculative Customer retention / Customer Lifetime Value (inferred, not directly measured)
n=450
0.01
Findings support regulatory focus on transparency, auditability, and consumer protections because low trust would slow adoption and reduce welfare gains from AI marketing. Governance And Regulation positive speculative Policy relevance (inferred impact on adoption and welfare)
n=450
0.01

Notes