Optimising Temporary Accommodation Placement Across London with AI-Powered SaaS in E-Governance Systems

Temporary accommodation has become a major fiscal and administrative pressure for English local authorities, particularly in London, where demand and costs have risen sharply. This paper documents the creation and use of DOMUS, a cloud-based, AI-enabled decision-support system built from scratch at the University of East London and customised for the needs of London Borough of Newham to support statutory Temporary accommodation placement. DOMUS integrates household case records, policy-constrained affordability and suitability rules, and live private-rental listings within a single governance-aligned workflow. The system combines transparent, rule-based filtering with large language model-assisted search to standardise the application of bedroom need, affordability thresholds, geographic preferences, and accessibility requirements, while preserving officer discretion and audibility. Household and property attributes are encoded into policy-consistent representations prior to AI-assisted ranking and explanation. A pilot deployment in Newham's secure environment evaluated operational performance relative to manual workflows. Results indicate substantial reductions in search time, improved adherence to key placement constraints, and high staff satisfaction, while maintaining statutory compliance and role-based accountability. Beyond TA, the paper frames DOMUS as replicable digital public infrastructure: a modular, cloud-native Software-as-a-Service architecture that can be deployed across other UK boroughs and adapted to other public administration tasks characterised by scarcity, rule-bound eligibility, and high stakes. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of scalable, ethically governed AI deployment in local government and contribute to debates on AI-enabled public value creation in e-governance.

Summary

Main Finding

DOMUS — a cloud-native, AI-assisted SaaS decision‑support system developed for the London Borough of Newham — substantially speeds and standardises temporary accommodation (TA) placements while preserving statutory compliance and officer discretion. In a pilot (secure council environment) DOMUS reduced average search time from ~2–3 hours to under 1 minute, improved adherence to key placement constraints from ≈65% to ≈85–90%, and scored high staff satisfaction (4.5/5). The system combines deterministic, policy‑aligned filtering with LLM-assisted retrieval and human-in-the-loop explanations, and is presented as a replicable digital public infrastructure for other boroughs.

Key Points

Policy problem and scale
- TA is a major fiscal and administrative pressure in England, acute in London (e.g., Newham: ~6,662 households in TA, large cost overspend).
- Rapid, consistent placement decisions are legally required and have high social stakes (education, health, stability).
System design and function
- DOMUS ingests anonymised household case records and live private-rental listings (Zoopla, Rightmove, OnTheMarket), enriches them with LHA rates, postcode→zone mappings, and service‑access geospatial data.
- Non‑negotiable constraints (bedroom need, affordability, zone, accessibility) are encoded into compact feature codes for deterministic rule‑based filtering before any model use.
- An LLM (Claude) is used for assistant-style search refinement, natural‑language prompt interpretation, ranking assistance, and human‑readable explanations — not for overriding policy constraints.
- The architecture is modular (Edge/CDN frontend, API gateway, identity/access, application services, integration layer, persistence, outbound communications), designed as a SaaS model deployable across boroughs.
Operational features
- End‑to‑end capabilities: case management, live multi‑platform listing aggregation, affordability checks (LHA), travel‑time/geospatial enrichment, shortlist tracking, outbound communications to landlords/agents, and audit logs.
- Deployed within the council’s secure environment with role‑based access controls and auditability to preserve accountability.
Pilot outcomes
- Search time: ~2–3 hours → <1 minute.
- Constraint compliance: ~65% (manual) → ~85–90% (DOMUS).
- Staff satisfaction: average 4.5/5; qualitative benefits cited: speed, transparency of LLM explanations, usability, and time freed for complex cases.
Ethical and legal safeguards
- Operates under statutory authority (Housing Act 1996) and incorporates governance measures: policy‑aligned deterministic filtering, minimal-impact scraping, role-based accountability, audit trails, and deployment inside council infrastructure.
Limitations noted by authors
- Evidence comes from an early pilot/simulation; further beta testing and longitudinal outcome evaluation are required.
- Risks remain around distributional trade-offs, fairness monitoring, and dependency on third‑party listing availability and mapping quality.

Data & Methods

Data sources
- Anonymised administrative household records from London Borough of Newham (attributes: household composition, bedroom needs, affordability limits, preferred zones, accessibility flags).
- Live property listings scraped from major UK portals (Zoopla, Rightmove, OnTheMarket).
- Lookup/auxiliary data: Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates, postcode→zone mappings, geospatial service locations (schools, GP, hospitals), travel-time APIs.
Representation & preprocessing
- Household and property attributes encoded as short alphanumeric feature codes (e.g., N200358A10) to capture non‑negotiable eligibility and affordability constraints.
- Same codes rendered into concise natural‑language prompts for LLM-assisted retrieval (e.g., “Find a 2‑bed property in zone A1 under £358”).
Algorithmic approach
- Deterministic, rule‑based filtering first enforces statutory/non‑negotiable constraints (bedroom need, LHA affordability, zone, accessibility).
- LLM (Claude) used for:
  - Interpreting officer inputs in natural language.
  - Assisting retrieval and ranking among pre‑filtered candidates.
  - Generating human‑readable explanations and answering follow‑up questions.
- System logs, audit trails, and role‑based controls preserve oversight.
Pilot evaluation
- Setting: live simulation in the council’s secure computing environment; frontline housing officers participated after short onboarding.
- Measurements: time-to-identify suitable matches, compliance with constraints (affordability, bedroom size, zone, accessibility), staff satisfaction via brief survey and informal interviews.
- Results: dramatic time savings (<1 minute retrieval), improved compliance (~85–90%), immediate communications to landlords, high user acceptance (4.5/5).
Caveats in methods
- Pilot scope: early-stage, limited scale; outcome measures focused on search/process metrics rather than long-term household outcomes (e.g., duration in TA, re‑entry rates).
- Potential upstream data quality and scraping coverage limitations; ongoing monitoring required.

Implications for AI Economics

Efficiency and fiscal impacts
- Large per‑case time savings (from hours to minutes) imply significant staff productivity gains and potential reductions in administrative costs per placement; at scale across boroughs this can materially lower TA operational costs.
- Faster shortlisting and immediate communications could reduce time households spend in TA and thus cumulative accommodation expenditure — but this needs longitudinal cost–benefit validation.
Standardisation, transaction costs, and fairness
- Deterministic policy encoding reduces inter‑officer variability (lower transaction costs from discretionary heterogeneity) and improves rule-consistent outcomes — which can raise perceived fairness and lower appeal/administrative overheads.
- However, algorithmic standardisation can produce system-level distributional effects: efficiency gains might favour some household groups over others unless fairness constraints are explicitly modelled and monitored.
Economies of scale and digital public infrastructure
- A cloud‑native SaaS model enables spreading fixed development and maintenance costs across multiple boroughs (economies of scale), supporting rapid replication and lower marginal deployment cost.
- Centralised or federated deployment raises governance trade-offs (standardisation vs. local policy customization, vendor lock‑in risks, data sovereignty).
Labour market and task composition
- Tool augments rather than replaces caseworkers in pilot framing: routine search tasks are automated, freeing staff to focus on complex judgments, negotiation, and welfare interventions. This suggests role reallocation and upskilling rather than large layoffs — but implementation may change staffing needs and career paths.
Market and supplier relations
- Reliance on scraped listings and third‑party portals creates dependencies (data access risk, platform terms, possible friction with private market actors). Minimally intrusive scraping was emphasised, but integrating with listing platforms via partnerships/APIs could alter costs/negotiation dynamics.
Evaluation & governance economics
- Economic value depends on measuring downstream outcomes (reduction in TA duration, re‑placement rates, household welfare, legal challenges avoided). Domain-specific metrics beyond predictive accuracy are critical for robust economic appraisal.
- Transparent explanations and auditable logs can lower adoption frictions, reduce legal/regulatory risk, and thus lower governance costs of AI deployment in public services.
Potential for optimisation vs ethical trade-offs
- More advanced optimisation (e.g., system‑level allocation to minimise re‑entry into homelessness) could further improve aggregate outcomes but raises ethical trade‑offs: optimizing system efficiency may disadvantage some households individually. Economists/policymakers must weigh efficiency gains against equity constraints and legal entitlements.
Research and policy priorities
- Need for cost‑effectiveness studies and randomized/controlled rollouts to quantify fiscal savings and welfare impacts.
- Ongoing fairness monitoring and distributional impact assessment should be budgeted as recurring governance costs.
- Consideration of procurement frameworks that balance economies of scale with local policy control and transparency (e.g., open standards, public-sector-led platforms).

Overall, DOMUS illustrates how hybrid rule‑based + LLM decision support can deliver immediate operational efficiencies and clearer audit trails in a high‑stakes public service. For AI economics, the promising micro‑efficiency gains must be supplemented with rigorous evaluation of downstream fiscal impacts, distributional effects, governance costs, and procurement choices to determine net public value at scale.

Assessment

Paper Typequasi_experimental Evidence Strengthmedium — The study uses a real-world pilot with objective operational metrics and user feedback, providing credible evidence of performance gains in practice; however, it is limited to a single borough, lacks randomization or external control groups, likely has a short evaluation window, and may be subject to selection and implementation biases, limiting causal certainty and external validity. Methods Rigormedium — The paper demonstrates careful systems engineering, rule encoding, and measurement of key outcomes (time, constraint adherence, satisfaction) within a secure operational environment, but does not report randomized assignment, pre-registered estimands, detailed statistical controls, sample sizes, or robustness checks that would be expected for high rigor causal inference. SamplePilot deployment in Newham (London Borough) using integrated household case records, policy-encoded household and property attributes, and live private-rental listings; evaluated by placement officers within Newham's secure environment; sample size and evaluation period not specified in the summary. Themesproductivity human_ai_collab org_design adoption governance IdentificationPilot deployment in the London Borough of Newham comparing operational metrics from DOMUS-assisted placement workflows against the prior manual workflows (measures reported include search time, adherence to placement constraints, and staff satisfaction); identification relies on within-organisation comparison during the pilot rather than random assignment or external controls. GeneralizabilitySingle-site (Newham) — may not generalize to other boroughs with different policies, casemix, or housing markets, Pilot operated in a secure, custom integration environment — real-world IT constraints in other councils may limit replication, Local statutory rules, affordability thresholds and housing supply conditions are UK-/London-specific, Unknown sample size and short-term evaluation — long-run effects and scalability risks not fully assessed, Officer behavior and uptake in other organisational cultures may differ

Claims (12)

Claim	Direction	Outcome	Confidence & Evidence	Details
Temporary accommodation has become a major fiscal and administrative pressure for English local authorities, particularly in London, where demand and costs have risen sharply. Fiscal And Macroeconomic	negative	demand and costs of Temporary accommodation	Reading fidelity high Study strength low	0.24
The paper documents the creation and use of DOMUS, a cloud-based, AI-enabled decision-support system built from scratch at the University of East London and customised for the needs of London Borough of Newham to support statutory Temporary accommodation placement. Organizational Efficiency	positive	existence and deployment of DOMUS	Reading fidelity high Study strength high	0.8
DOMUS integrates household case records, policy-constrained affordability and suitability rules, and live private-rental listings within a single governance-aligned workflow. Organizational Efficiency	positive	integration of data sources into workflow	Reading fidelity high Study strength high	0.8
The system combines transparent, rule-based filtering with large language model-assisted search to standardise the application of bedroom need, affordability thresholds, geographic preferences, and accessibility requirements, while preserving officer discretion and audibility. Decision Quality	positive	standardisation of policy application and preservation of discretion/audibility	Reading fidelity high Study strength medium	0.48
Household and property attributes are encoded into policy-consistent representations prior to AI-assisted ranking and explanation. Decision Quality	positive	encoding of attributes into policy-consistent representations	Reading fidelity high Study strength high	0.8
A pilot deployment in Newham's secure environment evaluated operational performance relative to manual workflows. Organizational Efficiency	null_result	operational performance relative to manual workflows	Reading fidelity high Study strength medium	0.48
Results indicate substantial reductions in search time. Task Completion Time	positive	search time	Reading fidelity high Study strength medium	0.48
Results indicate improved adherence to key placement constraints. Regulatory Compliance	positive	adherence to placement constraints	Reading fidelity high Study strength medium	0.48
Results indicate high staff satisfaction. Worker Satisfaction	positive	staff satisfaction with system	Reading fidelity high Study strength low	0.24
The deployment maintained statutory compliance and role-based accountability. Regulatory Compliance	positive	statutory compliance and role-based accountability	Reading fidelity high Study strength medium	0.48
DOMUS is replicable digital public infrastructure: a modular, cloud-native Software-as-a-Service architecture that can be deployed across other UK boroughs and adapted to other public administration tasks characterised by scarcity, rule-bound eligibility, and high stakes. Adoption Rate	positive	replicability and adaptability of system	Reading fidelity high Study strength speculative	0.08
The findings demonstrate the feasibility of scalable, ethically governed AI deployment in local government and contribute to debates on AI-enabled public value creation in e-governance. Governance And Regulation	positive	feasibility of scalable, ethically governed AI deployment	Reading fidelity medium Study strength speculative	0.05