The Commonplace
Home Dashboard Papers Evidence Syntheses Digests 🎲

Evidence (14055 claims)

Adoption
8570 claims
Productivity
7631 claims
Governance
6869 claims
Human-AI Collaboration
6491 claims
Org Design
4175 claims
Innovation
4114 claims
Labor Markets
3566 claims
Skills & Training
2966 claims
Inequality
2066 claims

Evidence Matrix

Claim counts by outcome category and direction of finding.

Outcome Positive Negative Mixed Null Total
Other 758 199 100 900 2007
Governance & Regulation 826 400 191 122 1563
Organizational Efficiency 777 193 124 84 1189
Technology Adoption Rate 635 233 124 97 1098
Research Productivity 422 128 57 336 954
Output Quality 476 179 59 47 761
Decision Quality 328 177 81 47 640
Firm Productivity 435 57 88 20 606
AI Safety & Ethics 218 277 65 33 599
Market Structure 180 170 123 24 502
Task Allocation 213 64 72 33 387
Skill Acquisition 170 61 61 17 309
Innovation Output 203 27 43 18 292
Employment Level 105 54 107 13 281
Fiscal & Macroeconomic 131 69 43 26 276
Consumer Welfare 117 63 42 11 233
Firm Revenue 153 48 26 3 230
Task Completion Time 173 31 8 12 225
Inequality Measures 44 122 49 6 221
Worker Satisfaction 89 65 22 12 188
Error Rate 69 92 10 2 173
Regulatory Compliance 77 69 14 5 165
Automation Exposure 56 56 26 13 154
Training Effectiveness 94 21 13 19 149
Wages & Compensation 77 36 25 6 144
Team Performance 86 17 27 10 141
Developer Productivity 95 17 14 6 133
Job Displacement 12 80 20 1 113
Hiring & Recruitment 52 7 8 3 70
Creative Output 31 18 8 3 61
Skill Obsolescence 5 46 6 1 58
Social Protection 27 16 8 2 53
Labor Share of Income 17 19 17 53
Worker Turnover 11 12 3 26
Industry 1 1
Research gaps include the need for causal evaluations (RCTs or quasi-experiments) of bundled interventions (training + placement + income support), cross-country comparisons of informality's moderating role, and better data on platform employment dynamics.
Identified research agenda and priorities summarized from the literature review and gap analysis in the paper; recommendation rather than empirical finding.
speculative positive Who Loses to Automation? AI-Driven Labour Displacement and t... evidence on effectiveness of bundled interventions and cross-country moderation ...
Empirical work on automation should distinguish task vs job displacement, measure platform algorithmic effects on labour demand, and quantify fallback employment options available to displaced informal workers.
Methodological recommendation based on gaps identified in the reviewed literature and limitations of existing studies; no new data collection presented.
speculative positive Who Loses to Automation? AI-Driven Labour Displacement and t... quality of empirical measurement (ability to isolate task vs job displacement an...
Policy responses should go beyond reskilling to include mechanisms addressing informality and job quality (e.g., portable benefits, minimum standards for platforms, guaranteed work or public employment schemes, wage floors, and training linked to placement).
Policy recommendation synthesized from literature on platform labour, social protection, and training program design; normative prescription rather than empirically validated intervention within this paper.
speculative positive Who Loses to Automation? AI-Driven Labour Displacement and t... worker welfare and employment security under combined policy interventions
Unchecked shifts toward K_T-dominated production can amplify political risks (rising inequality, fiscal strain) that may fuel populism, protectionism, and demands for renegotiated social contracts.
Theoretical political‑economy discussion supported by historical analogies and model scenarios linking fiscal stress and distributional change to political-instability risks; qualitative case evidence.
speculative positive The Macroeconomic Transition of Technological Capital in the... political risk indicators (populist support, policy volatility) — discussed qual...
To make AI a driver of structural change, policy interventions must link AI investment to comprehensive energy subsidy reform and accelerated development of the new and renewable energy sector.
Policy recommendation based on integrated analysis showing that subsidy burdens and import dependence limit AI's macro impact; proposed linkage is derived from the study's scenario/logic assessment.
speculative positive (conditional) AI-Based Technological Transformation as a Driver for Develo... potential for AI to drive structural change conditional on subsidy reform and re...